In a world where periods of change overlap and become increasingly longer, companies must find a balance between the two dimensions of their activity: (1) Operations, which aim to exploit current capabilities to achieve objectives, and (2) Projects, which add value to the organization by exploring new competencies. In other words, they must simultaneously focus on the organization’s functioning and its transformation.
Thus, the transformation of the organization, through the execution of projects, is an essential dimension for the company’s future. It includes all strategic and tactical initiatives and programs of the organization. Organizational change refers to innovation, transformation, agility, and long-term value creation.
However, only 8.5% of large projects achieve their targets regarding both cost and delivery time. In other words, 91.5% exceed the allocated budget and delay delivery! It seems unbelievable, but these are the results of Bent Flyvberg, who maintains a database of over 16,000 projects! Furthermore, 99.5% of projects exceed the allocated budget, delay delivery, yield unsatisfactory benefits, or combine all three parameters. As Flyvberg observes:
“To do what you said you would do should be routine or at least commonplace, but it almost never happens!”
One of the main causes of these failures can be found in the statement “Fail to Plan… Plan to Fail!” This statement is often attributed to Benjamin Franklin, but the author is less important than the implications of a lack of planning! If you fail to plan, you are simply planning to fail!